There is a case that has piqued my interest in recent years. Lakin v. Postal Life & Casualty Co., is a relatively simple story of two men whose paths crossed in Kansas City, Missouri, more than forty years ago. One was a down-in-the-luck drifter, and the other a con-artist who made his living by taking advantage of others. These two men would be long forgotten but for the fact that their final interactions during a hunting trip near Pleasant Hill, Missouri, raised some insurance law issues that ultimately made their way to the Missouri Supreme Court. Lakin stands for the unremarkable proposition that the legal relationship of one partner to another is not, by itself, sufficient to establish an insurable interest. If one partner takes out insurance on the life of the other partner in circumstances where the partner cestui que vie has neither capital nor skills to contribute to the partnership, it does not automatically follow that the partner who owns the policy on the other's life has an insurable interest sufficient to support the policy.
Robert H. Jerry, II, May Harvey Rest in Peace: Lakin v. Postal Life and Casualty Company, 2 Nev. L.J. 292 (2002), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/135