Abstract
Part I of this Comment briefly summarizes the pertinent facts of Huff. Part II surveys the current circuit split on intervention in Tax Court proceedings. Part III analyzes the proper standard for review of the USVI’s motion to intervene under FRCP 24(a)(2), as well as the proper standard regarding all appellate review of Tax Court procedural decisions—a discussion that is largely absent from both scholarly works and court opinions. This Comment concludes in Part III with a critique of the Huff court’s FRCP 24(a)(2) analysis.
Recommended Citation
Cole Barnett and Christopher Weeg,
Intervention in the Tax Court and the Appellate Review of Tax Court Procedural Decisions,
67 Fla. L. Rev.
1483
(2015).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol67/iss4/4