Subject Area
Civil Procedure; Environmental Law; Courts; Jurisprudence; Injury and Tort Law
Abstract
This Article has two related objectives: to develop a normative theory explaining how finality principles should apply in the land use context and simultaneously to argue that existing case law, however inarticulately, reflects that normative theory. Part I begins by exploring the distinctive structure of zoning doctrine, which fits imperfectly with traditional categorization of decisions as legislative or judicial. Part II examines more generally the role of finality in legal decisionmaking. Part III demonstrates that, in light of the structure of zoning doctrine, traditional claim preclusion doctrine should have no place in zoning law. This Article argues, by contrast, that issue preclusion doctrine should and does operate to constrain zoning decisionmakers. The Article goes on to demonstrate that this framework explains the results, even if not the language, in the vast majority of zoning cases that raise finality issues.
Recommended Citation
Stewart E. Sterk and Kimberly J. Brunelle,
Zoning Finality: Reconceptualizing Res Judicata Doctrine in Land Use Cases,
63 Fla. L. Rev.
1139
(2011).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol63/iss5/3