Abstract
This Comment discusses how the Arizona State Legislature majority reached its decision to uphold independent redistricting commissions, addresses issues that several of the dissenters raised, and analyzes how the decision will impact partisan gerrymandering and future redistricting reform. Part I briefly overviews reapportionment, gerrymandering, and redistricting reform. Part II then examines Arizona State Legislature and provides the legal and political context for the nearly five-year debate over the AIRC. Finally, Part III explores potential legal and policy ramifications of the decision on the future of partisan gerrymandering and redistricting reform.
Recommended Citation
Michael Woods,
Gerrymandering (Almost) Gone Wild: How the Supreme Court Saved Independent Redistricting Reform,
68 Fla. L. Rev.
1509
(2016).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol68/iss5/9