Abstract
This Article analyzes presidential speeches and the pleadings of the U.S. Government in response to a lawsuit by Jerusalem-born U.S. citizen Menachem Zivotofsky seeking to have “Israel” listed in his U.S. passport rather than “Jerusalem” as U.S. law now requires. The picture that emerges is one of a growing flexibility in U.S. policy toward Israel/Palestine in general and Jerusalem in particular. That flexibility moves away from adherence to two states (and impliedly two capitals in Jerusalem) to one emphasizing various “kinds” of democracy that may characterize a future Israeli state.
Recommended Citation
Halabi, Sam F.
(2014)
"Jerusalem in the Courts and on the Ground,"
Florida Journal of International Law: Vol. 26:
Iss.
2, Article 1.
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/fjil/vol26/iss2/1